Zakir Husain Delhi College Evening strives for excellence in all its endeavours, be it teaching-learning, infrastructure, faculty development, research, extension and outreach. In keeping with the vision to empower women and enable them to contribute meaningfully to nation building through quality education, the college works consistently:
|
* |
To stimulate the academic environment for promotion of quality teaching-learning and research |
|
* |
To upgrade institutional infrastructure to enable students to learn in a conducive environment |
|
* |
To foster global competencies among students |
|
* |
To inculcate a value system among students |
|
* |
To promote the use of technology and e-governance |
|
* |
To engage with all stakeholders and ensure a participatory management |
|
* |
To undertake self-evaluation and promote accountability |
Guidelines for the Creation of the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) and Submission of Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) in accredited institutions. In pursuance of its action plan for performance evaluation, assessment and accreditation and quality up-gradation of institutions of higher education, the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), Bangalore proposes that every accredited institution should establish an Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) as a post-accreditation quality sustenance measure. Since quality enhancement is a continuous process, the IQAC will become a part of the institution’s system and work towards realization of the goals of quality enhancement and sustenance.
The prime task of the IQAC is to develop a system for conscious, consistent and catalytic improvement in the overall performance of institutions. For this, during the post accreditation period, it will channelize all efforts and measures of the institution towards promoting its holistic academic excellence. The guidelines provided in the following pages will guide and facilitate the institution in the creation and operation of the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC). The work of the IQAC is the first step towards internalization and institutionalization of quality enhancement initiatives. Its success depends upon the sense of belongingness and participation it can inculcate in all the constituents of the institution. It will not be yet another hierarchical structure or a record-keeping exercise in the institution. It will be a facilitative and participative voluntary system/unit/organ of the institution. It has the potential to become a vehicle for ushering in quality enhancement by working out planned interventionist strategies to remove deficiencies and enhance quality like the “Quality Circles” in industries.
Some of the functions expected of the IQAC are:
|
* |
Development and application of quality benchmarks/parameters for various academic and administrative activities of the institution; |
|
* |
Facilitating the creation of a learner-centric environment conducive to quality education and faculty maturation to adopt the required knowledge and technology for participatory teaching and learning process; |
|
* |
Arrangement for feedback response from students, parents and other stakeholders on quality-related institutional processes; |
|
* |
Dissemination of information on various quality parameters of higher education; |
|
* |
Organization of inter and intra institutional workshops, seminars on quality related themes and promotion of quality circles; |
|
* |
Documentation of the various programmes/activities leading to quality improvement; |
|
* |
Acting as a nodal agency of the Institution for coordinating quality-related activities, including adoption and dissemination of best practices; |
|
* |
Development and maintenance of institutional database through MIS for the purpose of maintaining /enhancing the institutional quality; |
|
* |
Development of Quality Culture in the institution; |
|
* |
Preparation of the Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) as per guidelines and parameters of NAAC, to be submitted to NAAC. |
IQAC will facilitate / contribute
|
* |
Ensure heightened level of clarity and focus in institutional functioning towards quality enhancement and coordination among various activities of the institution in order to institutionalize all good practices. |
|
* |
Provide a sound basis for decision-making to improve institutional functioning; |
|
* |
Act as a dynamic system for quality changes in HEIs. |
|
* |
Build an organized methodology of documentation and internal communication. |